Convener: Alyn Gwyndaf
Participants: Various, incl. Jen, Sarah-Jane, Kirsty,
Li
Summary of discussion, conclusions and/or recommendations:
Some sketchy
notes. E&OE etc.
Curiosity
stirred by comments from ACE State of the Arts 2012, firstly about need for
greater integration/participation of community/society, and secondly about
reducing separation of artists. What does shift toward arts organisations
working with community imply for making a living as an artist? Is
curating/facilitating a necessary strategy for economic survival? What if
curating were itself community- rather than professionally-driven? Is a natural
boundary drawn by the point at which the money stops?
Practice focuses
on process of creating. Experience of curating as an incidental activity of
simply bringing people together to make stuff happen, aside from core creative
work. (Li)
Benefit of
curating in that it provides a structure, sustained across several
events/festivals, in which work/artists can flourish and grow. Question of
whether this is closer to producing (in an artist development model). Or how
does this differ from 'programming' – is it just a sexier title?
Curating is
itself a creative activity, and artists will themselves self-curate in terms of
editing work to create a portfolio. Equally, making a piece of work involves
curating different component parts and shaping how they come together.
Sheer volume of
work out there now necessitates curator/editor/gatekeeper, to provide clear
vision, authority and profile for presentation of work (c.f. filtering massive
volume of internet information). Thus audiences buy into particular curator and
their vision/taste; artists benefit by having a champion.
Increasing use
of the term 'curating.' Does this reflect an increasingly vogue term, or an
actual growth in substantive practice? Feeling toward the latter, especially
with the increasing number of festivals and other ad hoc events bringing
artists together in one place/time.
Curators still
rely on artists to lead or stimulate creative process, even where it's located
within the community.
Experience as
both curator and artist has shown that money can be earned from curatorial
activity, but not the creative. (Jen)
Drift into
discussion of 'sideline' work, which earns necessary money, alongside the
creative, and folk model of this being a legitimate practice, as opposed to
privileging the professional expectation of earning a living from creative
practice. Question of whether folk model only worked in agrarian/industrial
economies with well-structured work/leisure time, and not suited to current
'long-hours' working culture of post-industrial/information economy.
Also, folk model
implying a local/community ownership of the agenda. Case that “there's money in
the local,” but typically local council wanting to fund activities that tick
particular boxes for social mission. Not genuinely 'community' in that money
comes with an externally-imposed agenda.
General
acknowledgement of curating/creating/community as having fluid relationship,
rather than discrete areas of activity. Some artists seeing themselves as
rooted in their local community (not separate), and also shifting between
creating and curating activities.
Acknowledgement
that many of us blend creative practice, local (geographic) community and
creative community (curating) activities, along with maybe others again that
earn a living. Not problematic for any of us ourselves, but challenge to
establish recognition of this externally, e.g. how to articulate precisely what
it is we can offer to others. Need to champion the 'nebulous work package.'
Relational art
as a relevant perspective on discussion, seeking to locate work in a social,
human context, and explore connectedness.
Discussion of
exercising (and discussing) cash as an important part of acknowledging
integration of artist and community, sharing same economic concerns as everyone
else. Shoreditch location provided an interesting model of a community, with
local live/work/leisure patterns, albeit heavily monetised.
Acknowledgement
that our presence in that location invited community integration by bar
spending, and general drift away to exercise social contribution through beer
purchase.
No comments:
Post a Comment